Downloadable target correction char left jpg

This means that even when the chart is viewed at a steep angle like that shown in the photo at the top of this page, a large area of low-contrast gray still presents itself around the target, buffering it from anything else that the autofocus might lock on. Thus, with the precautions discussed later, you're sure that the autofocus locks onto the target bar if it locks onto anything at all. Toward the second important feature — allowing you to interpret relative focus — I've filled the area around the target with lines and boxes that, when viewed at an angle, make it quite clear how focus progresses as you inspect up and down the page:.

It should be readily apparent how useful the lines and blocks are when viewed this way, but it's perhaps useful to contrast this with a different method I've seen. I've seen autofocus test charts that use lines of random Lorem Ipsum text, because, as the author correctly notes, we are hypersensitive to the crispness of text, so it makes for good test fodder.

The problem with this approach is that we don't really care about absolute crispness , but want to scan up and down to gauge relative crispness.

For this, random lines of spaced text are not as good because there's no continuity as you scan vertically. On the other hand, this chart's vertical lines make for something that would be smooth and consistent throughout a vertical scan if focus were perfect throughout, but since focus is not perfect throughout, the smooth and consistent nature of the lines highlight clearly what is and isn't in focus.

Additionally, when some of the lines are dashed, the individual blocks making up the line become convenient visual markers of distance from the focus target, allowing you to quickly compare a block above the target with its counterpart the same distance below the target. The key to properly printing the test chart is to get a result in which the gray areas are faint enough that your camera's autofocus system can't lock onto them, but are distinct enough that you can use them to gauge the results.

Your situation may be different from mine, so I've built seven different versions of the test chart, each with differing levels of gray for the low-contrast areas. Any resizing necessarily incurs fuzziness, which can make interpretation of the results slightly more difficult. Depending on the printer, you may have to select borderless printing in order to fit the full image onto the page, or just as well, let a tad be cropped off. Either are better than resizing to fit the page.

If possible, print on high-resolution matte photo paper, such as Canon's MP Besides giving a crisper print, the paper is more sturdy, which makes it resistant to curling and warping both of which are detrimental to its successful use in testing focus.

After printing, test the appropriateness of the low-contrast gray by lighting the chart well, filling the viewfinder with the gray area, and checking to see whether the autofocus can lock on to it. If it can , you need to move to a lower -percent gray. The version you've printed holds promise if the autofocus system can't lock onto the gray, but the quick test you've just done is only preliminary. Be sure to check again under actual conditions after setting up for the real shot, as described below.

Using the test chart involves taking a picture of it, but it's important that it's done under the right conditions. Bright — you want enough light for the autofocus system to do its job, and to allow for a fast enough shutter speed, to reduce overall shake-induced blur. Wide open aperture — the wider the aperture that is, the lower the f-stop number , the more shallow the depth of field becomes, thereby accentuating any focus-related problems.

Using aperture-priority exposure mode makes this easy to ensure. Fast Shutter — you want a fast enough shutter speed to eliminate the blurring effects of camera shake.

That should cover most bases, but if you're skilled enough to think this page might be useful, you're probably skilled enough to know what shutter speed you need to eliminate shake-induced blur. You might also consider using a tripod, and a remote shutter release. Low ISO — the ISO sensitivity is not particularly important in its own right, but it's important to realize that while increasing it allows you to get more sensitivity from the sensor, but it does nothing for the autofocus system.

If you know you have plenty of light for the autofocus system and merely want to push the shutter speed really high, increasing ISO is fine. Just realize that pushing it too high adds some level of noise-induced blur to the overall picture. Personally, I like to keep the ISO under on my Nikon D, but I'll go to if needed when doing a quick focus test that I'll not put too much stock in.

Square to the Chart — it makes interpretation easier if you're exactly square to the bottom of the chart that is, you're aiming straight to the chart on the horizontal plane, without any side-to-side angle. Chart is Flat — if the chart is not perfectly flat, its slight rumples can have a large impact on the focus. It's okay if just the corners of the chart float a bit off the table. The focus is on the main part of the chart, so to speak, and that's the section that must be perfectly flat.

Using a heavy -stock paper helps a lot. Exposure Compensation — especially in really bright light e. A few sample shots should make it clear whether this is necessarily. Enough Distance — nothing will work if you're closer than the minimum focus distance of the lens, so be sure that you're far enough away that you're not bumping up against that limit. Note that some lenses have a different minimum-focus-distance between manual focus and autofocus. Zoom lenses can have a different minimum depending upon the focal length in use.

Deciding how far away you should be from the chart is influenced by what kind of test you want some lenses display autofocus accuracy that varies with subject distance , the focal length of the lens, and the nature of your autofocus sensors. It's possible that the active area of the camera's autofocus sensor exactly matches the indicator you see in the viewfinder, but it's not likely.

More likely is that the active area of detection is a bit larger, perhaps asymmetrically so. The photo sequences below illustrate the pitfalls of not understanding your camera's autofocus sensors. The right-hand image is just a closeup of the central part of the full-frame left-hand image. Mouseover the four descriptions below the pictures to see the story unfold It would be nice if the indicator in the viewfinder exactly matched the active area, but since that's not the case, it behooves you to understand your sensors.

I should be clear that the illustration above is just to make a point, and it's unlikely that any camera actually has an autofocus sensor shaped like that shown in steps 3 and 4. I'll leave the detailed description of mapping your autofocus sensors to the link in the previous paragraph, but in short, one way to measure the active area is to get close enough to the chart so that the low-contrast gray area fills the width of the viewfinder, and place the sensor indicator right in the middle of it.

Having nothing high-contrast anywhere nearby, it shouldn't be able to lock onto a focus, but instead, should hunt around until it gives up. If it can lock onto the low-contrast gray areas, you'll need to use one of the lower-percent gray versions offered in the How to Print It section.

Then, as you move the aim toward the high-contrast black running up and down the sides of the chart, keep trying the autofocus, and once it's able to lock on, note where the black begins relative to that edge of the sensor indicator. If you have multiple sensors, they may well each have their own characteristics, so you may wish to map them all, but for the purposes of testing your autofocus system, it's sufficient to use only the middle sensor.

Of course, the more you can fill the viewfinder with the chart, the better. Even if the scenario above results in a valid test, chart is too small to really make out much detail from it, even with the resolution my megapixel SLR affords. After taking into account everything in the previous section, it's a simple matter to take some shots. Take multiple shots at different angles of attack. A lower angle shows the depth of the in-focus field the most clearly and with it, the accuracy of the autofocus system , but requires the most care to ensure that the autofocus sensor does not see the top of the chart instead of the intended target.

Be very careful not to allow yourself to move the camera between achieving focus lock and actually taking the picture. Some people, for example, have an unconscious habit to move forward a half an inch in the process of taking the shot, and such movement would absolutely destroy any meaning to this test. Pause occasionally to double-check that the autofocus can't lock on the low-contrast gray by pointing at the wide expanse of it in the upper half of the chart and confirming that focus can't be found.

Once I've set up for a particular shot, I take it , then point the camera at something far and autofocus there, then return to autofocus on the chart, taking a second shot. I then do the same with something near if I'm not already near the minimum-focus distance of the lens and return for a third shot. This way, I feel sure that the autofocus is starting from scratch each time.

I got used to taking multiple shots set up the same way because my lens was giving somewhat random results. I guess that's one symptom of being broken, because after it was fixed , the results were consistently spot on.

After taking the shots, I load them into Adobe Lightroom and make a couple of quick adjustments to make the results a bit easier to see I convert them to grayscale, and adjust the contrast a bit to accentuate the low-contrast region. Lightroom is excellent for this because it lets me quickly zoom and pan on an image more quickly even than Photoshop , and to quickly flip back and forth among multiple images.

In interpreting the results, I look at both the vertical progression of the lines, and the numbers that run up and down the sides. Consider this example:. The depth of field here is only about 8 millimeters a third of an inch , so it's fairly easy to see the effects on the chart as it slices through the in-focus region.

The more clearly focused parts of the vertical lines seem to be properly centered on the target stripe, and comparable numbers e. Actually, in this case, there might be the slightest bit more sharpness to the numbers above the midline, but it's so slight that it could well be because the autofocus picked the top edge of the target stripe rather than the bottom edge.

That's how good the autofocus was with this shot. Frankly, it could be that the bottom sets of numbers have the slight edge in sharpness Here, the depth of field is almost 10 times larger 7. In this case , I focus more on the numbers haha, I'm so witty. In this case , that's to be expected because we're close enough to the chart that the depth of field is not evenly distributed in front of and behind the focus point: about 3.

However, when you increase image dimensions, the application inserts new pixels between existing pixels, and their colors are based on the colors of adjacent pixels. If you increase image dimensions significantly, images may appear stretched and pixelated. Changing the height and width of an image without changing the resolution results in quality loss.

Left to right: image with smaller dimensions, original image, image with larger dimensions. Note that the bigger the canvas size and resolution, the more pixels there are in a brushstroke, and the harder it may become for your computer to process it.

To ensure optimal brush and application performance, experiment to find the largest canvas dimensions that work best for your painting and for your software and hardware configuration. Home Tips Printing your artwork: Image size and resolution.

Add the download link code within your website HTML where you want it to appear. Test the link by clicking on it through your website and using it to download the file. Include your email address to get a message when this question is answered. Download links are typically created for files such as MP3 audio or executive EXE files that need to be run through external players or programs.

People do not usually add a download link for files such as JPG images or TXT text files since they can upload the file to be directly opened in most Internet browsers, making the process of downloading unnecessary. Helpful 0 Not Helpful 0. Submit a Tip All tip submissions are carefully reviewed before being published. Related wikiHows How to.

How to. Co-authors: Updated: October 26, Categories: Downloading. Thanks to all authors for creating a page that has been read , times. Is this article up to date? Yes No. Cookies make wikiHow better. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our cookie policy.

About This Article. You Might Also Like How to.